Equilibrium analysis in cake cutting
نویسندگان
چکیده
Cake cutting is a fundamental model in fair division; it represents the problem of fairly allocating a heterogeneous divisible good among agents with different preferences. The central criteria of fairness are proportionality and envy-freeness, and many of the existing protocols are designed to guarantee proportional or envy-free allocations, when the participating agents follow the protocol. However, typically, all agents following the protocol is not guaranteed to result in a Nash equilibrium. In this paper, we initiate the study of equilibria of classical cake cutting protocols. We consider one of the simplest and most elegant continuous algorithms – the Dubins-Spanier procedure, which guarantees a proportional allocation of the cake – and study its equilibria when the agents use simple threshold strategies. We show that given a cake cutting instance with strictly positive value density functions, every envy-free allocation of the cake can be mapped to a pure Nash equilibrium of the corresponding moving knife game. Moreover, every pure Nash equilibrium of the moving knife game induces an envy-free allocation of the cake. In addition, the moving knife game has an -equilibrium which is ε-envy-free, allocates the entire cake, and is independent of the tie-breaking rule.
منابع مشابه
Resource-monotonicity and Population-monotonicity in Cake-cutting
We study the monotonicity properties of solutions in the classic problem of fair cake-cutting — dividing a heterogeneous resource among agents with different preferences. Resourceand population-monotonicity relate to scenarios where the cake, or the number of participants who divide the cake, changes. It is required that the utility of all participants change in the same direction: either all o...
متن کاملEquilibria of Generalized Cut and Choose Protocols
Classic cake cutting protocols — which fairly allocate a divisible good among agents with heterogeneous preferences — are susceptible to manipulation. Do their strategic outcomes still guarantee fairness? We model the interaction among agents as a game and study its Nash equilibria. We show that each protocol in the novel class of generalized cut and choose protocols — which includes the most i...
متن کاملCake Cutting: Envy and Truth
We study envy-free cake cutting with strategic agents, where each agent may manipulate his private information in order to receive a better allocation. We focus on piecewise constant utility functions and consider two scenarios: the general setting without any restriction on the allocations and the restricted setting where each agent has to receive a connected piece. We show that no determinist...
متن کاملCake Cutting Algorithms for Piecewise Constant and Piecewise Uniform Valuations
Cake cutting is one of the most fundamental settings in fair division and mechanism design without money. In this paper, we consider different levels of three fundamental goals in cake cutting: fairness, Pareto optimality, and strategyproofness. In particular, we present robust versions of envy-freeness and proportionality that are not only stronger than their standard counter-parts but also ha...
متن کاملAn Algorithmic Framework for Strategic Fair Division
We study the paradigmatic fair division problem of fairly allocating a divisible good among agents with heterogeneous preferences, commonly known as cake cutting. Classic cake cutting protocols are susceptible to manipulation. Do their strategic outcomes still guarantee fairness? To address this question we adopt a novel algorithmic approach, proposing a concrete computational model and reasoni...
متن کامل